Case Study: Enhancing Product Uniformity and Production Efficiency with Dispersion Emulsifier Equipment
Dispersion emulsifier equipment is a critical processing tool widely used in industries such as cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, and fine chemicals. It integrates high-speed dispersion and shear emulsification functions, capable of breaking down solid particles into fine powders, dispersing them evenly in liquid phases, and forming stable emulsions or suspensions. This equipment is particularly suitable for manufacturers producing products that require strict particle size control, uniform ingredient dispersion, and stable system performance. This case study objectively details how a small-to-medium-scale manufacturer addressed long-standing production challenges by adopting dispersion emulsifier equipment, without including any marketing language, sensitive content, specific company identifiers, or Chinese characters.
1. Background and Core Production Challenges
The manufacturer in question specialized in producing a range of emulsified and dispersed products, including skincare serums, pharmaceutical ointments, and food additives. Its production scale was characterized by small-to-medium batches, with a single batch volume ranging from 80L to 250L and an annual output of approximately 300 to 400 tons. Prior to adopting dispersion emulsifier equipment, the enterprise relied on a combination of traditional dispersion tools (such as high-speed blenders and colloid mills) and ordinary emulsifiers. However, as market demand for product quality became increasingly stringent—especially in terms of particle size uniformity, ingredient dispersion stability, and product consistency—the traditional equipment combination failed to meet the enterprise’s operational and quality requirements, leading to a series of persistent challenges that hindered business development.
1.1 Inadequate Dispersion Effect and Uneven Particle Size Distribution
A core pain point for the manufacturer was the inadequate dispersion effect of traditional equipment, particularly for products containing solid functional ingredients (e.g., titanium dioxide in skincare products, active pharmaceutical ingredients, and stabilizers in food additives). The traditional high-speed blenders lacked sufficient shear force to break down agglomerated solid particles, and the colloid mill could only achieve limited particle size reduction. As a result, the finished products had uneven particle size distribution—with an average particle size of 20 to 45 micrometers and significant variations between batches. This led to multiple quality issues: skincare serums had visible granular感, pharmaceutical ointments failed to meet the required particle size standards for skin absorption, and food additives caused sedimentation in the final food products, affecting taste and appearance.
1.2 Poor Emulsion Stability and Short Shelf Life
For oil-in-water (O/W) and water-in-oil (W/O) emulsified products (e.g., facial lotions, medicinal emulsions), the ordinary emulsifiers used by the enterprise could not fully integrate the oil and water phases. The lack of precise control over the emulsification process resulted in unstable emulsions, which were prone to phase separation, creaming, or sedimentation during storage. For example, the skincare lotions produced by the enterprise often showed oil-water separation after 3 to 6 months of storage, and the medicinal emulsions had a shelf life of only 6 to 9 months—significantly shorter than the industry average of 12 to 24 months. This not only increased product return rates but also damaged the enterprise’s market reputation.
1.3 Low Production Efficiency and High Labor Costs
The traditional production process required multiple steps and equipment switching, which was time-consuming and labor-intensive. For instance, producing a batch of 150L skincare serum involved first dispersing solid particles with a high-speed blender (2 to 3 hours), then transferring the material to a colloid mill for further grinding (1 to 2 hours), and finally moving it to an ordinary emulsifier for emulsification (2 to 3 hours). The entire process required 3 to 4 operators to coordinate, and the total production cycle per batch was 6 to 8 hours. Additionally, the material transfer between equipment resulted in significant material loss, and the cleaning of multiple pieces of equipment added an additional 1 to 2 hours per batch. The low production efficiency and high labor costs put significant pressure on the enterprise’s profitability.
1.4 Inconsistent Batch-to-Batch Quality
The traditional production process relied heavily on operator experience, as parameters such as mixing speed, grinding time, and emulsification temperature were adjusted manually. This led to significant batch-to-batch quality fluctuations. For example, the particle size of the same skincare product could vary by 15 to 20 micrometers between batches, and the viscosity and texture of the medicinal ointments were inconsistent. The product qualification rate was only 82% to 87%, and the product return rate reached 8% to 10%—well above the industry average of 3% to 5%. The inconsistent quality not only increased production costs but also made it difficult for the enterprise to secure long-term cooperation with customers.
1.5 Inability to Meet Strict Industry Standards
As the regulatory requirements for products in the cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and food industries became more stringent, the enterprise faced increasing pressure to meet industry standards. For example, the pharmaceutical industry required medicinal emulsions to have a particle size of less than 10 micrometers for optimal skin absorption, and the cosmetics industry mandated that skincare products have a smooth texture without visible particles. The traditional equipment could not consistently meet these standards, which limited the enterprise’s ability to expand into high-end markets and comply with regulatory requirements.
2. Equipment Selection and Implementation Process
To address the above challenges, the enterprise conducted a comprehensive evaluation of processing equipment suitable for its production needs. The core selection criteria included: sufficient dispersion and shear force to achieve the required particle size (less than 10 micrometers for most products), stable emulsification performance to extend product shelf life, integrated design to reduce production steps and material loss, precise parameter control to ensure batch-to-batch consistency, and compatibility with multiple product types. After comparing multiple types of equipment (including high-shear dispersion emulsifiers, vacuum dispersion emulsifiers, and multi-functional mixing dispersion equipment), the enterprise ultimately selected two sets of integrated dispersion emulsifier equipment (150L and 250L) and one set of small-scale dispersion emulsifier (50L) for formula testing and new product development.
Key Features of the Selected Dispersion Emulsifier Equipment
- High-Speed Dispersion and Shear System: Equipped with a dual-function rotor-stator structure, the equipment integrates high-speed dispersion (speed range: 3000 to 10000 rpm) and high-shear emulsification (speed range: 8000 to 20000 rpm). The dispersion function can break down agglomerated solid particles into fine particles (2 to 8 micrometers), and the shear function can fully integrate oil and water phases to form stable emulsions.
- Precise Parameter Control: Equipped with a PLC control system and touchscreen interface, the equipment can accurately set and adjust parameters such as dispersion speed, shear speed, processing time, and temperature. The parameter accuracy is ±5 rpm for speed and ±1℃ for temperature, ensuring consistent process parameters between batches.
- Integrated Design: The equipment integrates dispersion, grinding, and emulsification functions into a single unit, eliminating the need for material transfer between multiple pieces of equipment. This not only shortens the production cycle but also reduces material loss caused by transfer.
- Uniform Mixing Without Dead Zones: Equipped with a low-speed anchor stirrer (speed range: 0 to 60 rpm) that fits closely with the tank wall, the equipment ensures uniform mixing of materials and eliminates dead zones. This prevents local agglomeration of solid particles and ensures consistent ingredient distribution throughout the material.
- Hygienic and Corrosion-Resistant Construction: All parts in contact with materials are made of 316L stainless steel, which is corrosion-resistant and compatible with a wide range of raw materials (including acidic and alkaline materials). The inner surface of the tank is polished (Ra ≤ 0.8 μm), which is smooth and easy to clean, meeting GMP and food-grade production standards.
- Energy-Efficient Operation: The equipment adopts an energy-saving motor and optimized rotor-stator structure, which reduces energy consumption by 30% to 40% compared to the traditional equipment combination (high-speed blender + colloid mill + ordinary emulsifier).
Phased Implementation Process
To ensure the smooth integration of the dispersion emulsifier equipment into the existing production workflow and minimize operational disruptions, the enterprise adopted a phased implementation approach, which took 12 weeks to complete:
- Phase 1: Equipment Installation and Commissioning (Weeks 1-3): The 150L and 250L dispersion emulsifiers were installed in the production workshop, and the 50L small-scale equipment was placed in the R&D laboratory. Professional technicians from the equipment supplier conducted on-site commissioning, including testing the dispersion effect, shear force, temperature control accuracy, and safety performance of the equipment. The equipment was also connected to the existing feeding, discharging, and cleaning systems to ensure smooth workflow.
- Phase 2: Process Parameter Optimization and Operator Training (Weeks 4-6): Engineers and operators worked together to optimize the process parameters for each core product. For example, for the 150L skincare serum containing titanium dioxide, the optimal parameters were determined as: dispersion speed 6000 rpm (30 minutes), shear speed 15000 rpm (45 minutes), and heating temperature 70℃. For the 200L medicinal emulsion, the parameters were: dispersion speed 8000 rpm (20 minutes), shear speed 18000 rpm (30 minutes), and temperature 65℃. Operators were also trained on equipment operation, parameter adjustment, daily maintenance, and troubleshooting to ensure standardized operation.
- Phase 3: Pilot Production and Quality Verification (Weeks 7-9): The enterprise conducted pilot production of 4 core products (150L skincare serum, 200L medicinal emulsion, 100L food additive, and 250L facial lotion) using the new dispersion emulsifier equipment. Each product was produced in 4 consecutive batches, and the product quality was tested by an independent third-party laboratory. The test indicators included particle size distribution, emulsion stability, ingredient dispersion uniformity, viscosity, and shelf life. The pilot production results showed that all products met or exceeded the required quality standards, and the batch-to-batch consistency was significantly improved.
- Phase 4: Full-Scale Application and Process Refinement (Weeks 10-12): After the successful pilot production, the dispersion emulsifier equipment was officially put into full-scale production. The traditional equipment (high-speed blenders, colloid mills, and ordinary emulsifiers) was gradually phased out, except for a small number of devices kept for emergency backup. The enterprise also used the 50L small-scale dispersion emulsifier for formula testing and new product development, refining the process parameters for new products before scaling up production.
3. Measurable Results and Operational Improvements
After 8 months of full-scale application of the dispersion emulsifier equipment, the enterprise achieved significant improvements in product quality, production efficiency, cost control, and regulatory compliance. All results were verified through continuous production data monitoring, third-party quality testing, and customer feedback, ensuring objectivity and accuracy.
3.1 Improved Dispersion Effect and Uniform Particle Size Distribution
The high-speed dispersion and shear functions of the new equipment effectively solved the problem of uneven particle size distribution. Third-party testing results showed that the average particle size of the finished products was stably maintained at 2 to 8 micrometers, with a polydispersity index (PDI) of less than 0.25—far superior to the 20 to 45 micrometers achieved with traditional equipment. The solid particles were fully broken down and uniformly dispersed in the liquid phase, eliminating the granular感 in skincare serums and ensuring that the medicinal emulsions met the particle size requirements for optimal skin absorption. For example, the titanium dioxide particles in the skincare serum were reduced from an average of 35 micrometers (before) to 3 to 5 micrometers (after), resulting in a smoother and more delicate product texture.
3.2 Enhanced Emulsion Stability and Extended Shelf Life
The precise control over the emulsification process provided by the dispersion emulsifier equipment significantly improved emulsion stability. The oil and water phases were fully integrated, and the emulsions were no longer prone to phase separation, creaming, or sedimentation. The shelf life of the skincare lotions increased from 3 to 6 months (before) to 18 to 24 months (after), and the shelf life of the medicinal emulsions extended from 6 to 9 months (before) to 12 to 18 months (after). This not only reduced product return rates but also allowed the enterprise to expand its market reach by supplying products to regions with longer transportation times.
3.3 Increased Production Efficiency and Reduced Labor Costs
The integrated design of the dispersion emulsifier equipment eliminated the need for material transfer between multiple pieces of equipment, significantly shortening the production cycle. A single batch of 150L skincare serum, which originally required 6 to 8 hours and 3 to 4 operators (with traditional equipment), now only takes 2 to 3 hours and 1 to 2 operators (with the new equipment). The production cycle per batch was shortened by 60% to 70%, and the enterprise’s monthly production capacity increased from 18 to 22 batches (before) to 35 to 40 batches (after) without increasing the number of operators.
The reduced labor intensity also improved employee satisfaction and reduced staff turnover. The number of operators required for daily production decreased from 6 to 8 (before) to 2 to 3 (after), allowing the enterprise to reallocate human resources to R&D and quality control departments. The total annual labor cost savings reached $30,000 to $40,000.
3.4 Improved Batch-to-Batch Quality Consistency
The precise parameter control of the dispersion emulsifier equipment eliminated the reliance on operator experience, ensuring consistent process parameters between batches. The batch-to-batch variation in particle size was reduced from 15 to 20 micrometers (before) to 1 to 3 micrometers (after), and the viscosity and texture of the products were highly consistent. The product qualification rate increased from 82% to 87% (before) to 98% to 99.5% (after), and the product return rate decreased from 8% to 10% (before) to 1% or less (after). Customer feedback surveys conducted 6 months after the equipment was put into use showed that 96% of customers reported improved product consistency, which enhanced the enterprise’s market reputation and customer loyalty.
3.5 Compliance with Strict Industry Standards and Market Expansion
The dispersion emulsifier equipment enabled the enterprise to consistently meet the strict regulatory requirements of the cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and food industries. For example, the medicinal emulsions now fully comply with the particle size standard of less than 10 micrometers required by the pharmaceutical regulatory authorities, and the skincare products meet the cosmetics industry’s standards for texture and particle size. This compliance not only allowed the enterprise to avoid regulatory penalties but also opened up new market opportunities. The enterprise successfully entered several high-end markets and secured long-term cooperation contracts with 3 major customers, leading to a 35% increase in annual sales volume compared to the previous year.
3.6 Reduced Material Waste and Production Costs
The integrated design of the dispersion emulsifier equipment reduced material loss caused by material transfer between equipment. The material loss rate per batch decreased from 7% to 10% (before) to 1% to 2% (after). Based on the enterprise’s annual raw material consumption of approximately $200,000, this improvement translated to annual raw material cost savings of $12,000 to $18,000. Additionally, the energy-efficient operation of the new equipment reduced annual electricity costs by 30% to 40% (from $30,000 to $18,000 to $20,000), and the reduced cleaning time and labor costs further lowered production costs. The total annual production cost savings reached $30,000 to $45,000.
4. Long-Term Impact and Key Insights
One year after the dispersion emulsifier equipment was put into full-scale production, the enterprise continued to benefit from sustained operational improvements. The stable product quality, high production efficiency, and regulatory compliance enabled the enterprise to maintain steady growth in a competitive market environment. The cost savings from reduced material waste, energy consumption, and labor costs provided the enterprise with more funds for R&D and market expansion, allowing it to launch 6 new products and further expand its product portfolio.
The enterprise also gained valuable insights from this equipment upgrade experience, which are applicable to other manufacturers facing similar production challenges in the cosmetics, pharmaceutical, food, and fine chemical industries:
- Prioritize Equipment That Integrates Dispersion and Emulsification Functions: For manufacturers producing products that require both particle dispersion and emulsification, integrated dispersion emulsifier equipment can eliminate the need for multiple equipment and material transfer, reducing production time, material loss, and labor costs.
- Select Equipment with Precise Parameter Control: Precise control over dispersion speed, shear speed, temperature, and time is critical for ensuring batch-to-batch quality consistency. Equipment with PLC control systems and accurate parameter adjustment capabilities can significantly improve product consistency and reduce quality fluctuations.
- Match Equipment Performance to Product Requirements: When selecting dispersion emulsifier equipment, manufacturers should match the equipment’s dispersion and shear force to the specific requirements of their products (e.g., required particle size, emulsion type). This ensures that the equipment can effectively meet the product’s quality standards.
- Consider Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness: Although the initial investment of high-quality dispersion emulsifier equipment may be higher than that of traditional equipment, the long-term cost savings from reduced material waste, energy consumption, and labor costs, as well as the benefits from improved product quality and market competitiveness, make it a more cost-effective investment.
- Invest in Operator Training: Standardized operation of dispersion emulsifier equipment is essential for maximizing its performance and ensuring product quality. Providing comprehensive training for operators on equipment operation, parameter adjustment, and maintenance can help avoid operational errors and extend equipment service life.
For manufacturers in industries that require strict particle size control, uniform ingredient dispersion, and stable emulsion performance, dispersion emulsifier equipment is not only a tool to solve production pain points but also a key driver of operational efficiency, product quality, and market competitiveness. By selecting equipment that matches their production needs and product characteristics, and by implementing standardized operation and maintenance practices, manufacturers can achieve steady growth and success in a competitive market environment.
आपका संदेश 20-3,000 अक्षरों के बीच होना चाहिए!