logo
Banner
Case Details
Home > Cases >

Company Cases about Case Study: High-Temperature Resistant Food Emulsifier Optimizing Small-Batch Production Processes

Events
Contact Us
Mrs. Samson Sun
86--18665590218
Contact Now

Case Study: High-Temperature Resistant Food Emulsifier Optimizing Small-Batch Production Processes

2026-01-06

Case Study: High-Temperature Resistant Food Emulsifier Optimizing Small-Batch Production Processes

In the food processing sector, small-batch production of heat-demanding emulsified products often faces unique challenges related to temperature control, emulsion stability under high heat, and equipment durability. This case study examines how a high-temperature resistant food emulsifier addressed critical production bottlenecks for a small-scale food processing facility, enabling reliable emulsification at elevated temperatures while maintaining product quality, operational safety, and process efficiency.

Background

The facility focuses on small-batch production of emulsified food products that require high-temperature processing, including heated fruit preserves, caramel-based fillings, dairy-derived creams, and spicy sauces with thermally activated ingredients. Its daily output ranges from 80 to 250 kilograms, with production processes involving emulsification at temperatures between 70°C and 110°C. Prior to adopting the high-temperature resistant emulsifier, the facility relied on conventional mixing equipment modified with basic heating elements. This setup struggled to cope with the thermal demands of the products, leading to recurring operational and quality issues.

Challenges

The facility encountered four key challenges when processing emulsified products at high temperatures:
  1. Emulsion Breakdown Under High Heat: Conventional equipment failed to maintain stable oil-water integration at temperatures exceeding 85°C. Heat-induced viscosity changes and ingredient degradation caused emulsions to break down, resulting in visible separation, grainy textures, and inconsistent product density. For caramel-based fillings processed at 100°C, the emulsion failure rate reached 22%, leading to significant product waste.
  2. Equipment Durability and Safety Risks: Standard mixing equipment’s seals, gaskets, and non-heat-resistant components degraded rapidly under prolonged high-temperature operation (4-6 hours daily). This caused frequent oil or material leaks, increased equipment downtime, and posed potential safety hazards such as overheating and cross-contamination. Maintenance was required every 2-3 weeks to replace worn parts.
  3. Poor Temperature Uniformity: The modified heating elements in conventional equipment generated uneven heat distribution within the mixing tank. Localized hotspots (up to 120°C) damaged heat-sensitive active ingredients (e.g., natural flavor compounds, functional proteins), while cooler areas (below 65°C) prevented complete emulsification. This led to batch-to-batch variations in flavor, texture, and shelf life.
  4. Low Processing Efficiency: To mitigate emulsion breakdown, the facility adopted a slow heating and mixing protocol, extending the total processing time per batch to 90-120 minutes. Post-production cleaning was also time-consuming, as high-temperature residues adhered firmly to non-resistant surfaces, requiring harsh cleaning agents and prolonged scrubbing.

Solution: Adoption of a High-Temperature Resistant Small-Scale Food Emulsifier

To overcome these challenges, the facility invested in a small-scale high-temperature resistant food emulsifier with a batch capacity of 15-60 liters. The equipment was engineered specifically for continuous operation at temperatures up to 130°C, with key design features tailored to high-heat food processing:
  • Heat-resistant construction: Tank body, stator-rotor assembly, and contact parts made of reinforced 316L stainless steel, capable of withstanding thermal expansion and corrosion at elevated temperatures;
  • High-temperature sealing system: Silicone-free, food-grade fluoropolymer seals and gaskets, designed to maintain integrity at 130°C without degradation or leaching;
  • Uniform heating system: Integrated jacketed tank with precise temperature control (±1°C) and forced heat circulation, eliminating hotspots and ensuring consistent emulsion temperature;
  • Adjustable high-shear technology: Stator-rotor with rotational speed range of 3,500-13,000 rpm, optimized to maintain emulsification stability even at high temperatures and varying viscosities;
  • Heat-resistant control panel: Insulated, waterproof control module with temperature monitoring and overheat protection, ensuring operational safety under high-temperature conditions.
The implementation process included equipment calibration, process parameter optimization, and staff training on high-temperature operation safety. Technical personnel adjusted rotational speed, heating rate, and emulsification duration based on product-specific temperature requirements. For example, caramel fillings were processed at 105°C with a rotational speed of 9,000 rpm and a 30-minute emulsification cycle, while dairy creams required 85°C operation at 7,500 rpm for 25 minutes.

Results and Improvements

After a four-month trial and process refinement, the high-temperature resistant emulsifier delivered measurable improvements in product quality, equipment reliability, and operational efficiency:

1. Enhanced Emulsion Stability at High Temperatures

The equipment’s high-shear action and uniform heating system effectively prevented emulsion breakdown at target temperatures (70-110°C). For caramel-based fillings, the emulsion failure rate dropped from 22% to less than 2%, and oil-water separation was eliminated even after 30 days of ambient storage. The shelf life of heated fruit preserves extended from 3 months to 6 months, reducing product waste by 30%.

2. Improved Equipment Durability and Safety

The heat-resistant seals, gaskets, and structural components significantly reduced equipment wear. Maintenance intervals extended from 2-3 weeks to 3-4 months, and downtime due to part replacement decreased by 85%. The overheat protection and leak-proof design eliminated safety hazards, ensuring compliance with food processing safety standards for high-temperature operations.

3. Consistent Product Quality Across Batches

Uniform heating eliminated hotspots, preserving heat-sensitive ingredients and ensuring consistent product flavor and texture. Sensory evaluation pass rates increased from 68% to 96%, with batches maintaining homogeneous texture, stable viscosity, and consistent flavor profiles. The coefficient of variation (CV) for product density dropped from 12% to less than 8%, reflecting improved batch consistency.

4. Increased Production Efficiency

Optimized high-temperature emulsification reduced total processing time per batch from 90-120 minutes to 30-45 minutes, a 55% reduction. The heat-resistant tank surface and smooth interior reduced residue adhesion, cutting cleaning time by 45% (from 40 minutes to 22 minutes per batch). Daily production capacity increased to 400 kilograms without additional labor or workspace, enabling the facility to fulfill urgent orders more efficiently.

5. Expanded Product Capabilities

The ability to reliably emulsify at temperatures up to 130°C allowed the facility to develop new product lines, including high-temperature-processed spicy sauces, thermally set dairy creams, and fortified fruit preserves. These new products contributed to a 25% increase in revenue within six months of equipment adoption.

6. Reduced Operational Costs

Lower product waste, extended maintenance intervals, and improved efficiency reduced unit production costs by 20%. The equipment’s energy-efficient heating system and high-shear technology consumed 35% less energy than the conventional modified equipment, further lowering operational expenses.

Long-Term Impact and Future Plans

The adoption of the high-temperature resistant emulsifier has strengthened the facility’s competitive position in the small-batch specialty food market, enabling it to deliver consistent, high-quality products that meet strict thermal processing requirements. Repeat customer orders increased by 35% due to improved product stability and consistency.
Looking ahead, the facility plans to integrate the emulsifier with a small-scale automated feeding system to further optimize high-temperature processing workflows. It also intends to leverage the equipment’s temperature data logging function to enhance process traceability, aligning with evolving food safety regulations for heat-processed products.

Conclusion

For small-scale food processing facilities focused on high-temperature emulsified products, specialized high-temperature resistant equipment is essential to overcoming the unique challenges of heat-induced emulsion instability, equipment wear, and quality inconsistency. This case demonstrates that a compact, high-temperature resistant food emulsifier can reliably maintain performance under elevated temperatures, delivering improvements in product quality, operational efficiency, and equipment durability without large-scale capital investments.
By aligning equipment capabilities with high-temperature processing needs, small food processors can not only resolve immediate production bottlenecks but also unlock new product development opportunities, enhancing long-term sustainability and competitiveness in the specialty food market.