Case Study: Small-Scale Vacuum Homogenizing Emulsifier in Cosmetic R&D and Small-Batch Production
In the cosmetic industry, R&D laboratories and small-batch production facilities require emulsification equipment that balances precision, flexibility, and consistency—capable of handling small material volumes while replicating large-scale production conditions. Traditional small-scale emulsification tools, such as manual mixers or basic emulsifying cups, often lack vacuum functionality, uniform shear force, and process control, leading to inconsistent sample quality, difficulty scaling up formulations, and inefficient small-batch manufacturing. This case study objectively details how a small-scale vacuum homogenizing emulsifier addressed these challenges, optimized R&D workflows, and improved small-batch production reliability for cosmetic formulations.
1. Background and Production Challenges
The facility specializes in cosmetic R&D and small-batch customization, focusing on high-end facial serums, creams, and sensitive-skin formulations. Prior to adopting the small-scale vacuum homogenizing emulsifier, it relied on conventional equipment: laboratory stirrers for R&D and a basic 20L emulsifying pot for small-batch production. Persistent issues emerged that hindered workflow efficiency and product quality stability.
First, R&D formulation reproducibility was poor. Conventional stirrers lacked sufficient shear force and vacuum capability, resulting in inconsistent particle sizes (8-12 μm) and residual air bubbles in samples. This made it difficult to accurately evaluate formulation efficacy, texture, and stability—critical for scaling up to large-scale production. Formulations that performed well in the lab often failed to meet quality standards during pilot-scale trials, requiring repeated adjustments and delaying time-to-market.
Second, small-batch production suffered from quality fluctuations. The basic emulsifying pot lacked precise temperature control and uniform homogenization, leading to batch-to-batch variations in viscosity, texture, and emulsification stability. For sensitive-skin formulations containing fragile active ingredients (e.g., hyaluronic acid, natural extracts), excessive shear or exposure to oxygen caused ingredient degradation, reducing product efficacy and increasing material waste.
Third, workflow inefficiency and cross-contamination risks existed. The separate R&D and small-batch equipment required manual transfer of formulations, increasing the risk of contamination and altering sample properties. Additionally, the lack of process parameter recording made it difficult to trace the root cause of quality issues, and cleaning the basic emulsifying pot’s hard-to-reach areas was time-consuming, limiting the number of formulations that could be processed daily.
To resolve these issues, the facility sought a small-scale emulsification solution capable of handling 5-30L batches, providing vacuum deaeration, uniform homogenization, precise process control, and compatibility with both R&D and small-batch production. After evaluating technical specifications and conducting pilot tests, a 30L small-scale vacuum homogenizing emulsifier was selected for integration into its workflow.
2. Equipment Selection and Technical Adaptation
Tailored to the facility’s R&D and small-batch needs, the 30L small-scale vacuum homogenizing emulsifier was designed to balance compact size, precision, and scalability. Key technical features and adaptations are as follows:
Core Homogenization and Vacuum System
The emulsifier features a dual-stage rotor-stator homogenizing head with a maximum rotational speed of 10,000 rpm and linear speed of 42 m/s. The adjustable rotor-stator gap (0.15-0.3 mm) generates intense shearing, cavitation, and turbulent forces, effectively breaking down oil droplets and solid particles into micro-dispersions (2-4 μm). A 5.5 kW variable-frequency drive (VFD) motor enables stepless speed adjustment (1,000-10,000 rpm), allowing precise control of shear intensity to protect fragile active ingredients. The integrated vacuum system maintains a stable vacuum degree of -0.095 to -0.098 MPa, eliminating air bubbles during emulsification and minimizing oxidative degradation of sensitive ingredients.
Compact Design and Material Compliance
With an overall dimension of approximately 1200×800×1600 mm and a net weight of 350 kg, the equipment fits in laboratory and small production spaces. All product-contacting parts are fabricated from 316L stainless steel, electrolytically polished to a surface roughness Ra ≤ 0.4 μm to prevent material adhesion and cross-contamination. The detachable homogenizing head and smooth chamber interior facilitate easy cleaning, supporting frequent formulation changes—critical for R&D workflows.
Precision Control and Data Traceability
A jacketed chamber with a PID temperature control system regulates processing temperatures between 20-80℃ with a precision of ±1℃, supporting both electric heating and water cooling. This ensures stable emulsification conditions and prevents thermal denaturation of heat-sensitive ingredients. The equipment is equipped with a compact PLC touchscreen control system, enabling real-time monitoring and adjustment of key parameters (homogenization speed, vacuum degree, temperature, mixing time). The system stores up to 30 formulation parameter profiles and automatically records batch data (processing time, temperature, speed), facilitating R&D documentation and small-batch production traceability.
Auxiliary Mixing and Versatility
To ensure uniform material circulation in small batches, the emulsifier is equipped with a low-speed anchor-type stirrer (50-300 rpm, 0.75 kW motor) that scrapes the chamber wall to eliminate dead corners. This combination of high-speed homogenization and low-speed stirring ensures consistent emulsification across the entire batch volume. The equipment supports both oil-in-water (O/W) and water-in-oil (W/O) formulations, adaptable to various cosmetic products—from light serums (viscosity 1,000-5,000 mPas) to thick creams (viscosity 50,000-80,000 mPas).
3. Implementation and Process Optimization
The facility integrated the small-scale vacuum homogenizing emulsifier into a unified workflow for both R&D and small-batch production, eliminating the need for separate equipment and manual sample transfer. The technical team conducted multi-batch tests to optimize parameters for three core formulation types: hydrating serums (O/W), anti-aging creams (W/O), and sensitive-skin lotions (low-irritation O/W).
Pilot test results yielded formulation-specific optimal parameters: For hydrating serums containing hyaluronic acid, a homogenization speed of 8,000 rpm, vacuum degree of -0.096 MPa, processing temperature of 35℃, and 15-minute emulsification time achieved uniform particle size (2-3 μm) and a bubble-free, lightweight texture—preserving hyaluronic acid activity. For thick anti-aging creams, a higher homogenization speed of 9,000 rpm, extended mixing time (25 minutes), and intermittent homogenization (3 minutes on, 1 minute off) ensured complete oil-water fusion without excessive heat generation. For sensitive-skin lotions, a lower temperature (30℃), reduced shear speed (7,000 rpm), and 10-minute post-emulsification vacuum hold eliminated residual bubbles and minimized ingredient irritation potential.
The optimized unified workflow is as follows:
- Preprocess raw materials (melting oil-phase components, dissolving water-soluble excipients, filtering extracts) in laboratory beakers, preheating to the specified temperature.
- Transfer preprocessed materials into the 30L chamber (effective capacity 25L) in a preset sequence to minimize air entrapment.
- Activate the vacuum system to reach the target degree (-0.095 to -0.098 MPa) and start the anchor stirrer to circulate materials.
- Activate the homogenizer at the preset speed, adjusting as needed based on real-time temperature and texture observations.
- Maintain stable temperature via the jacketed system, then cool the formulation to 25℃ while continuing gentle stirring.
- Extend vacuum hold for 5 minutes to remove residual bubbles, then stop all operations.
- For R&D: Collect samples for efficacy and stability testing; for small-batch production: Discharge the finished product into sterile containers for packaging.
This workflow eliminated manual transfer steps, reduced cross-contamination risks, and ensured that R&D parameters could be directly replicated in small-batch production. The detachable homogenizing head and smooth chamber design reduced cleaning time by 40%, enabling the facility to process up to 8 different formulations daily—double the previous capacity.
4. Application Results and Performance Improvements
After integrating the small-scale vacuum homogenizing emulsifier, the facility achieved measurable improvements in R&D efficiency, small-batch production quality, and workflow sustainability—with consistent outcomes across all formulation types:
R&D Efficacy and Scalability
Formulation reproducibility was drastically enhanced: particle size was stabilized at 2-4 μm (compared to 8-12 μm previously), with batch-to-batch variation in key parameters (viscosity, pH, particle size) reduced from ±7% to ±2%. This enabled accurate evaluation of formulation efficacy and stability, reducing the number of iterative adjustments needed before scaling up. The equipment’s ability to replicate large-scale production conditions (vacuum, shear force, temperature control) increased the success rate of pilot-scale trials from 50% to 85%, shortening time-to-market for new products by 30%.
Small-Batch Production Quality
Small-batch product quality was significantly improved: all batches met texture and stability standards, with no detectable residual bubbles or graininess. Emulsification stability was enhanced—products passed 3 months of accelerated stability testing (40℃±2℃, relative humidity 75%±5%) without phase separation. The gentle shear control preserved active ingredient efficacy, with sensitive-skin formulations showing a 20% reduction in irritation incidents reported by customers. The automated data recording system simplified quality traceability, enabling quick identification and resolution of rare quality deviations.
Workflow Efficiency and Cost Reduction
Workflow efficiency was optimized: the unified R&D and small-batch equipment eliminated manual sample transfer, reducing labor time by 35%. Cleaning time was shortened by 40%, and the ability to store formulation profiles reduced setup time for repeated batches by 50%. Material waste was cut by 60%—the precise process control minimized ingredient degradation and batch failures, and the small chamber volume reduced leftover materials in R&D trials. Maintenance costs were low due to the equipment’s modular design and wear-resistant components, with annual maintenance requirements limited to routine cleaning and occasional seal replacement.
Compliance and Flexibility
سياسة الخصوصية |
خريطة الموقع
| الصين جودة جيدة آلة التجانس الفراغية المورد. حقوق الطبع والنشر © 2025-2026 Yangzhou Aipuweier Automation Equipment Limited Company جميع الحقوق محفوظة
يجب أن تكون رسالتك بين 20-3000 حرف!